Sunday, December 9, 2012

Final Draft Formal Paper #2

Santa Cruz, CA 95060

December 11, 2012

Jean Kilbourne
1234 Kilbourn Ln.
Jeantowne, MI 11111

Dear Ms. Kilbourne:
It’s true that all throughout human civilization, at least in the majority of western culture, females have been the underdog of society. As you stated in an exert from your piece Advertising and Violence, women in modern society are absolutely no exception to the disadvantages provided by western civilization and, in contemporary civilization, they are not only subject to suppressive abuse by their male counterparts, but in fact are also subject to oppression in the form of mass media; a hierarchy quit separate from any form of oppression privy, and of which further encourages said male counterparts to participate even more in roles that are suppressive to females. The oppression that women face through media is that which supposedly represents the thoughts of society at large; male, and female, young, and old, black, and white, etc. According to your piece, Ms. Kilbourne, it seems that the oppression women receive from media is far more elusive and indirectly domineering, than the oppression women have received in years past; media prescribes oppression via images and vague subliminal messages that influence unbeknownst to the oppressed. According to your piece, these images create an environment in which the male gender are made to believe that it’s ok to mistreat and dominate over a woman, and women are made to believe that that dominance is simply their reality. But I have to ask, how is this oppression really any different from any other oppression women have already received? If society used to be even more patriarchal than is today, wouldn’t that suggest that the reality being given then is in fact very similar to the reality that media is giving to us now? And if that is the case, then why is it that women are all of sudden just as susceptible to this oppression now as they used to be in the past? Have women really made such little progress?
            It’s absolutely true that the images the media displays of women have very adverse effects on them and on society as a whole. The images have the potential to be incredibly detrimental to the way women think about and perceive themselves; they can have the ability to very negatively persuade the ill-equipped mind into behaving and thinking in ways that are unconducive to the betterment of woman kind and in turn, of all of society. By condoning behavior that is both base and fruitless towards the efforts of creating a just and equal society for all, media makes women’s struggle for equality all the more difficult and should be fully reprimanded for said difficulty imposed upon the female gender. The images media produces suggest that it’s acceptable behavior for a male to hold a woman at gun point or to suggest that women should utilize their sexuality as a means of obtaining success and material goods. In providing these images the media sets an expectation for females to act in a manner that is limiting for them, and that renders them incapable of finding their true potential for success and happiness, as well as preventing the rest of society from being able to see that potential as well.
            Expectations, however, seem to be what the feminist movement has been opposed to all throughout the entirety of its being. In the early Americas it was the oppression for women to remain as a housewives that were unheard and unseen that required women to have to retaliate and in doing so, to be condemned as a witch or impure. In the 50’s and 60’s, when the feminist movement as we know it was on its rise, was it not the struggle for equal opportunities and to be taken seriously among society that drove females so definitively towards the passing of equal rights and equal opportunities legislation. It’s a harsh truth to accept, but isn’t it in the norm of the of the women’s rights movement and females to continuously be the ones who have to rise above and against one form of oppression or another.  As such a seasoned group of civil rights activists, is it not time that the female rights movement starts to handle their oppression in a mature manner? If modern feminists’ predecessors from the 1960’s were the adolescence of the feminist movement, wouldn’t that make its members thirty years in the future the mature and qualified members of the movement?  If all women were simply just suppressed and diminished by the effects of media and mass culture, than we must ask ourselves how women like US Treasury Undersecretary for international affairs, Lael Brainard, or US chair of Secretaries and Exchange Commission, Mary Schapiro are to be accounted for. Regardless of what propaganda and media is present, these women have somehow been able to obtain incredibly powerful and respectable positions in society, and have been able to put themselves in positions of which even most men find difficult to achieve. The mature feminist does not only make the argument that media is suppressive and violent towards the rights of women; the mature feminist is already aware of the forces in favor of suppressing her, and instead of generating more complaints about said suppression, she takes the next step in the feminist evolution and takes action to break through the barriers said suppression.
            Growing up, I was the daughter of a single father, and can first-hand say that the suppression and adverse effects that media has on society are not only those belonging to women. The struggles my father faced as, first, being a husband and a father, and then as being just a single father, drew much more sympathy from me, than the struggle of my single mother being able to make it as such after my parents had had their separation. As a child, my father grew up in an incredibly patriarchal household, and as a parent and as husband, my father had an incredibly difficult time overcoming the standards on which he was brought up. His father was an exact representation of the behavior media condones and endorses for modern culture and more specifically for males. By having to face that reality everyday of his adolescent life, my father grew to hate and resent the reality he was being presented with, and he knew that that reality was not something that he ever wanted to take part in. His rejection of that reality caused him much confusion and grief in his struggle to find an alternative to it, and ultimately, is what lead to his and my mother’s separation due to her inability to accept his rejection of the societal norms that the lived in. Even after their separation, my father found much difficulty than my mother and received far less sympathy in terms of custody rights and government benefits in being a single father.
In Joan Morgan’s piece, From Fly-Girls to Bitches and Hos, some of the arguments regarding the male gender’s struggle in society are more heavily touched upon. Although veered more towards the black community and the struggles encountered by African-American males, Morgan argues that to counter the injustices and misogyny directed at women by the male gender, females cannot simply point a finger and say “The things you’re saying are wrong and us women condemn you and hate you for saying them!” Morgan states that to deal with such misogyny, the female community has to do what their opposition has not; they have to find an understanding for their male counterparts, and not treat them as just a generalized other. This need for understanding also applies to the role of media; for those who understand the means of suppression used by media, the desire to criticize and demonize it is an absolutely rational one. Given all the misdeeds media has put upon the already disadvantaged female gender, how could any female not feel infuriated? But that desire needs to be put aside; without providing education and examples of what it means to overcome and defeat said media alongside what criticisms they have, the feminist provides no means to overcome said criticisms and simply exaggerates the conditions woman are in, which in some cases prove to only provide them with yet more of a sense of hopelessness and worry.
I don’t think it’s simply by chance that male suicide rates in the US is 1 to 4 with males taking the steadfast lead over women; by these statistics I think it’s safe to assume that women are not the only ones who have been cheated by the media and effect of modern society. If females are still arguing for their equality and to find justice within the media, news, and regulations and on the other side of the argument, the male portion of our society is killing themselves at four times the rate of the females, then can women really be so blind as to say that the problems and effects of society and media are really just their own? The fact that this issue is even just that, an argument, is probably a good starting point in which a solution for that equality can be found. How can equality be found when each side of the issue is pointing fingers at the other, and making accusations against one another?
Morgan states that, “…rap music is essential to that struggle (the struggle of stopping sexism) because it takes us straight to the battlefield.” In Morgan’s metaphor she describes the struggle of finding feminist rights in modern culture as a result of understanding the struggles that exist within other parts of our societal community, of which is greater than I believe the feminist community has yet to acknowledge, and of which puts the feminist movement into such a light that makes it incredibly difficult to deny the progress feminism has made up to this modern day. A true measure of the progress females have made in modern society should not be measured their ability put down what used to an opposition; the real measure of the feminists progress should be acknowledged by their ability to forgive and let go of what is the past so as to take unity and find strength between one another, and put their efforts into something that will push them forward and not keep them in an everlasting cycle of arguing and placing blame.

Sincerely,



Arianna Brown












Work Cited
American Foundation for Suicide Prevention. American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, 2012. Web. 27 Nov. 2012.
This website contains statistics of suicide rates up until the year 2010.



Kilbourne, Jean. “‘Two Ways a Woman Can Get Hurt’: Advertising And Violence”. Rereading America: Cultural Contexts for Critical Thinking and Writing. By Gary Colombo, Robert Cullen, and Bonnie Lisle. 8th ed. Boston: Bedford of St. Martin's, 1992. 575-600. Print.


This exert from Jean Kilbourne's book Can't Buy My Love: How Advertising Changes the Way We Think and Feel is Kilbourne's reflection on the effects that the media's portrayal of females could be having on the females of the US.


Morgan, Joan. "From Fly-Girls to Bitches and Hos". Rereading America: Cultural Contexts for Critical Thinking and Writing. By Gary Colombo, Robert Cullen, and Bonnie Lisle. 8th ed. Boston: Bedford of St. Martin's, 1992. 575-600. Print.


This essay by Morgan describes what she describes as a need for an understanding of the male stigma towards the degrading of women prior to condemning them and judging them for said degradation.

"The Most Powerful Women You've Never Heard Of." Foreign Policy 193 (2012): 1. MasterFILE Premier. Web. 11 Dec. 2012.

This is an article interviewing several very successful women (women who own their own business or are in positions of great responsibility and power)

Wednesday, December 5, 2012

Revised Draft Post


Santa Cruz, CA 95060

November 26, 2012

Jean Kilbourne
1234 Kilbourn Ln.
Jeantowne, MI 11111

Dear Ms. Kilbourne:
It’s true that all throughout human’s civilization, at least in the majority of western culture, females have been the underdog of society. This is a tragedy to say the least; the influence that women could’ve generated all throughout the progression of human civilization could have been not only a positive one, but it could have also prevented some of the great tragedies throughout our history or it could have caused some new eras of transgression or achievement that we haven’t already achieved as the human race. For women to have only just recently been bestowed with the power to influence society and to and make choices that are their own is indeed something that would make sense for every woman to feel unjustified and infuriated. Any person who had been put through so much injustice would not be wrong in feeling anger and frustration towards those who caused them said injustice. But at what point in time have arguments that were lead by anger and frustration been the correct and appropriate way of dealing with a heated issue or a problem, or, at least, when has been the best way in which neither parties were left disadvantaged or hurt.
            In the struggle regarding women’s rights, it’s important to realize that it’s not just women who have been disadvantaged by the struggle for power and equality between the sexes, and the disadvantage that has been endured by our male counterparts should not just conveniently be glazed over. It’s true that by stamping out a woman’s voice, any and all of her opinion goes left disregarded, unacknowledged, and void of having the ability to take control over her own life, but to counter that argument, what if your voice not only spoke for your own personal well being, but also spoke for the well being of those that you cared about and all of their futures and the future all those to follow you. Even more so, what if your significant other, the person that a one typically becomes closest to in their life, isn’t someone that can be depended upon to assist as an equal during hardships and failures or as someone who can support you when times are hard, but is instead a dependent of whom you are responsible for along with yourself and all others you might take care of. Any failure that you make is not just your own, but is also a failure for those around and those you care for, and to deprive one’s self of such a responsibility, would be to deprive one’s self of some of the most gratifying and happiest aspects of one’s life.
In Joan Morgan’s piece, From Fly-Girls to Bitches and Hos some of these points of the male gender struggle are more heavily touched upon. Although veered more towards the black community and the struggles encountered by black males specifically in the rap industry, Morgan argues that to counter the injustices and misogyny directed at women by the male gender, us females cannot simply point the finger and say “What you’re doing is bad! You can’t say those things or us women we’ll condemn you and hate you!” No, Morgan states that to deal with such misogyny the female community has to do what our opposition not; we have to learn to understand them. Females, feminists, have to learn to view our male counterparts as more than just the generalized other of a demon that suppresses and objectifies women, as feminism seems to often preach them to be. Woman must learn to view our fathers and brothers and friends, that the male race tends to be in our day to day life, as being equally as conditioned as us women have been to act and think a certain way in which society has taught them is an alright and acceptable way for them to act and think. Who’s to say that any of our male counterparts wanted to be thrust into a role of dominance and control, in which their duties are portrayed as being the tireless, unwavering being who is a failure if they do not succeed in gaining success and power and assuming total responsibility of taking care of those they care for and love? I don’t think it’s just by chance that the rate of male suicides in the US is a 1 to 4 ratio in which males take the lead. And yet we women preach that we’ve had a difficult time with our societal pressures, and that we’ve been the victimized gender by society.
By the statistics shown above I think it’s safe to assume that women are not the only ones who have potentially been cheated by our modern society. The fact that this argument has been going on for as long as it has is another clear indication also, which indicates that something within the struggle for male and female equality hasn’t been working out quite right. If females are still arguing for their equality and finding injustice within the media, news, and the regulations that are constricting them, and, on the other side of the argument, the male portion of our society is killing themselves at four times the rate of the females, then what about this argument isn’t working? The fact that this issue is even just that, an argument, is probably a good starting point in which a solution for that equality can be found. How can equality be found when each side of the issue is pointing fingers at the other side and making accusations against them and towards them? Morgan states that, “…rap music is essential to that struggle (the struggle of stopping sexism) because it takes us straight to the battlefield.” In Morgan’s metaphor she describes the struggle of finding feminist rights in modern culture a result another already existing struggle within the community of males themselves, and if the community of males that she’s speaking of exists just within the black community, then the issue that’s taking place within the entire male community must be on an even larger scale than I believe the feminist community has yet to acknowledge. A true measure of the progress females have made in modern society should not be measured an ability to fight and put down what used to an opposition, but should in fact be acknowledged by the ability of females to forgive and take unity and newly found strength in one another to, instead of fighting the opposition, fix it and heal it so that our efforts are put into something lasting and real and not the exact same as what women had been made to suffer when it was men that possessed the upper hand, because without the healing and restoration put in place, there will be no real equalization between the issue of gender, just a continuous shifting of the gender which possesses the upper hand.

Monday, November 26, 2012

Rough Draft (Paper #2)

Santa Cruz, CA 95060

November 26, 2012

Jean Kilbourne
1234 Kilbourn Ln.
Jeantowne, MI 11111

Dear Ms. Kilbourne:
It’s true that all throughout human’s civilization, at least in the majority of western culture, females have been the underdog of society. This is a tragedy to say the least; the influence that women could’ve generated all throughout the progression of human civilization could have been not only a positive one, but it could have also prevented some of the great tragedies throughout our history or it could have caused some new eras of transgression or achievement that we haven’t already achieved as the human race. For women to have only just recently been bestowed with the power to influence society and to and make choices that are their own is indeed something that would make sense for every woman to feel unjustified and infuriated. Any person who had been put through so much injustification would not be wrong in feeling anger and frustration towards those who caused them said injustification. But at what point in time have arguments that were lead by anger and frustration been the correct and appropriate way of dealing with a heated issue or a problem, or, at least, when has been the best way in which neither parties were left disadvantaged or hurt.
            In the struggle regarding women’s rights, it’s important to realize that it’s not just women who have been disadvantaged by the struggle for power and equality between the sexes, and the disadvantage that has been endured by our male counterparts should not just conveniently be glazed over. It’s true that by stamping out a woman’s voice, any and all of her opinion goes left disregarded, unacknowledged, and void of having the ability to take control over her own life, but to counter that argument, what if your voice not only spoke for your own personal well being, but also spoke for the well being of those that you cared about and all of their futures and the future all those to follow you. Even more so, what if your significant other, the person that a one typically becomes closest to in their life, isn’t someone that can be depended upon to assist as an equal during hardships and failures or as someone who can support you when times are hard, but is instead a dependent of whom you are responsible for along with yourself and all others you might take care of. Any failure that you make is not just your own, but is also a failure for those around and those you care for, and to deprive one’s self of such a responsibility, would be to deprive one’s self of some of the most gratifying and happiest aspects of one’s life.
In Joan Morgan’s piece, From Fly-Girls to Bitches and Hos some of these points are more heavily touched upon. Although veered more towards the black community and the struggles encountered by black males in the rap industry, Morgan argues that to counter the injustices and misogyny directed at women in rap music, us females cannot simply point the finger and say “What you’re doing is bad! You can’t say those things or us women we’ll condemn you and hate you!”, no, Morgan states that to deal with such misogyny we have to do what our opposition not; we have to learn to understand them. We have to learn to view our male counterparts as more than just the generalized other and  the demon that feminism sometimes seems to preaches them to be, but we have to view our fathers and brothers and friends, that the male race tends to be in our day to day life, as being just as dispositioned as us women have been, to be to act and think a certain way in which society has lead them to believe is an alright and acceptable way for them to be. Who’s to say that any of our male counterparts wanted to be thrust into a position of power and dominance in which they have to be completely responsible for those they care for and love? I don’t think it’s just by chance that the rate of male suicides in the US alone is 1 to 4 with males taking the lead, and yet we women preach that we've had a difficult time with our societal pressures, by these statistics I think it’s safe to assume that were not the only ones who are being potentially cheated by our society. The fact that this argument has been going on for as long as it has is another clear indication too, that something in the struggle between male and female equality isn't working out quite right. If females are still arguing for their equality and finding injustifications within the media, news, and the regulations that are constricting them, and then, on the other side of the argument, the male portion of our society is killing themselves at four times the rate of the females, then what about this argument isn't working?
The fact that this argument for equality is even just that, an argument, is probably the best place to start in terms of find a solution for that equality. How can equality be found when each side of the struggle is pointing fingers and making accusations?

Sunday, November 18, 2012

Annotated Bibliographies (Formal Paper #2)

Curtis, Carole. "Powerful Women, Sound Advice." Westchester County Business Journal 48.11 (2012): 2. MasterFILE Premier. Web. 20 Nov. 2012


This is an article interviewing several very successful women (women who own their own business or are in positions of great responsibility and power)


Kilbourne, Jean. “‘Two Ways a Woman Can Get Hurt’: Advertising And Violence”. Rereading America: Cultural Contexts for Critical Thinking and Writing. By Gary Colombo, Robert Cullen, and Bonnie Lisle. 8th ed. Boston: Bedford of St. Martin's, 1992. 575-600. Print.


This exert from Jean Kilbourne's book Can't Buy My Love: How Advertising Changes the Way We Think and Feel is Kilbourne's reflection on the effects that the media's portrayal of females could be having on the females of the US.


Morgan, Joan. "From Fly-Girls to Bitches and Hos". Rereading America: Cultural Contexts for Critical Thinking and Writing. By Gary Colombo, Robert Cullen, and Bonnie Lisle. 8th ed. Boston: Bedford of St. Martin's, 1992. 575-600. Print.


This essay by Morgan describes what she describes as a need for an understanding of the male stigma towards the degrading of women prior to condemning them and judging them for said degradation.

American Foundation for Suicide Prevention. American Foundation for Suicide Prevention, 2012. Web. 27 Nov. 2012.

This website contains statistics of suicide rates in the til up to the year 2010.


Proposal Formal Paper #2


Proposal Formal Paper #2
Title: Undecided
Author: Me J
Date: 11/18/12
Topic: Women’s power in the modern world. Equal with of man?
Analysis of Argument
Exigence: To demonstrate all the forms and sources of power and influence that women hold in the modern world, in comparison to those possessed my men, and in doing so to prevent from the somewhat one-track mind set the feminist movement can sometimes tend to have.
Intended Audience: All females! And specifically to Jean Kilbourne in response to her exert in the Rereading America textbook. I think it’s imperative for all women to understand the advantage that they truly do have in our modern society; women who waste time talking about how they could have more power instead of taking advantage of the powers they already possess and being the example of the kind of woman they say they stand for, and women who just simply aren't aware of the power’s they've always possessed and just need to be made aware, not told that they are just a product of a society in which they are helpless, weak, and victimized, like Kilbourne made them out to be.
Purpose: To allow Kilbourne to know that making statements that confirm that media is having an impact on society which is suppressing and negative towards women is hardly enough in the process of fixing that problem, and is just as good as pointing a finger in blame, and then walking away with no means of making a solution or finding a compromise with what/who it is you're pointing the finger to.
Logos: For the logical reasoning in the essay/business letter I will compare both Kilbourne and Morgan's pieces, and elaborate on each their arguments so as to to draw out the pros and cons of each and eventually explain how Morgan's reasoning is more realistic and effective than Kilbourne's at generating empowerment for women, and finding a real means to equality of the sexes.
Ethos: For the ethical    reasoning of this business letter I will use the examples of women who've achieved great success to back what I have to say, and I will also describe my position as a woman and, at that, a woman who also envisions a path for success.
Pathos: For the emotional appeal of this piece I will describe a need for understanding on both sides of the spectrum, for both men and women, and how this understanding will lead to better harmony and happiness for both men and women.


Sunday, November 4, 2012

RR#3: Kilbourne


                In an exert from Kilbourne’s 1999 piece, Can’t Buy My Love: How Advertising Changes the Way We Think and Feel, Kilbourne describes the effect that media and advertising have on female’s in  America; she explains their effect on how a woman views her sexuality, and how we, Americans, view sexuality in general. Kilbourne employs well used and well known arguments to describe the adverse effects mass media has on American culture, demonizing America’s media and marketing industries, stressing their corruption, immorality and their devaluation of family values. However, Kilbourne specifically stresses how the utilization of sexuality by large corporations in mass media is objectifying and dehumanizing to the role of women in society, and is an unjustified means for selling a product. Kilbourne uses a lot of primary source ads to demonstrate her cases; she interprets said advertisements in very perverse and negative ways, making sure to demonstrate how each image and slogan could be taken to have very negative and insulting implications towards the female gender, and plows through a number of advertisements in an identical and similar manner.
Kilbourne describes the appeal of using bondage, sexual aggression, and rape in advertising as attractive due to its ability to link these things with the possession of the product being advertised, or, as Kilbourne puts it, “…it fetishizes products, imbues them with an erotic charge-”, along with the charge put upon the product being advertised, Kilbourne also suggests that the roles that each gender portrays in the advertisements that sell said product are, in a way, being sold as well. Kilbourne suggests that the advertisements that are being put out in which the sexualization of both males and females are included in pursuit of selling a product, are, in fact, condoning certain behaviors of said males’ and females’ sexuality, making those behaviors more sellable and appealing whilst doing similarly for the product. Kilbourne suggests that these advertisements, by displaying women in such weak and submissive ways, and by being as successful as they are in selling their product by doing so, are also very successful in their ability to sell women aspiration to become weak and submissive and to acquire those attributes just like they were able to acquire the product that was advertised.
          The pictures of ads Kilbourne put alongside her writing were irrefutably suggestive of male dominance and exploitation of women’s sexuality and bodies, and included incredibly violent and shocking images of women at gun point and looking vulnerable, scared, and weak. My original reaction to the pieces was that the images were ludicrous, indecent, and unacceptable. For the most part I felt disassociated and very objectively towards the ads, I not feel as if I could relate to the women in the ads and their air of absolute powerlessness and defenselessness. That’s not to say that I wasn’t able to understand the origin of those feelings, but my predisposition to the effects that advertisements and media are intended to have on the individuals that they’re directed at.

Monday, October 29, 2012

RA#2



Title: From Fly-Girls to Bitches and Hos

Author: Joan Morgan

Date: 1999

Topic: Causes and effects of sexism in hip-hop music and culture

Exigence: To create a better and deeper understanding of why sexism is used in hip-hop music/culture.

Intended Audience: The general public, but possibly more specifically, females and feminists, and white people.

Purpose: To enlighten people as to why African-Americans might use derogatory language and action towards females in their culture.

Claim: To establish the healing and progress of females in the Black community, it will take more than simply stating that the misogyny of woman in hip-hop music is wrong and inappropriate; it will first take the acceptance and emotionally distancing of females from the presence of black male misogyny, and, second, the understanding of the origins of said misogyny before any other action towards healing can begin.

Main Evidence: Morgan states that, “As a black woman and a feminist I listen to the music with a willingness to see past the machismo in order to be clear about what I’m really dealing with” and that, “…good time in most of hip-hop is really alcoholism, substance abuse…they have no expectation to see their twenty-first birthday…” Morgan clearly sees that there is a lot more going on in the realm of hip-hop music and black men then just the objectification of the female gender, and the it truly is useless to just say, “Don’t speak like that about your sisters; it’s bad,” when the problems behind the objectification is rooted in problems that stem from things that go much deeper.

Pathos: Morgan made an emotional appeals to her audience by using direct and first person questions like in her writing that she states are meant for her hip-hop writing brothers; “ Why is disrespecting me one of the few things that make them feel like men? What’s the haps, what are you going through on the daily that’s got you action so foul?”(603). Morgan says these questions are intended for her “brothers” but seeing as it was audience that were the ones who ended up reading the questions, it was her audience that were put in the position to answer those questions, or at least to consider what it would mean to answer those questions, instead of the hip-hop singing black men that Morgan says the questions are for.

Logos: Morgan brings logic into this exert by making a direct quote from an actual hip-hop artist, Biggie Smalls, or Notorius B.I.G., stating, “I don’t wanna live no more/Sometimes I see death knockin’ at my front door…”(603) making it irrefutable for her audience to deny that the hip-hop artists that are accused of objectifying women are simply just that, and proving her point that there’s much more to them than just their objectification.

Ethos: Several times throughout her piece Morgan states that she is both a feminist and black female, “…Being black and a woman makes me very fluent in both isms…” (605). By make this statement, she makes her audience aware that her words is on that has a first person, non objective view, of the argument that is being made and is therefore on to be taken very seriously and without question.

My Response: Morgan did a beautiful job at drawing attention to an issue that I think is definitely one that is a sad reality of the world we live in today; males in the black community, like most other males all communities, has been made subject to many expectations and requirements as to what it means for them to be a man and to be made worthy by their peers and society. As well as being made subject to these expectations Morgan’s brothers have also been made subject to the oppression of America and all of its past, and existing, prejudices and racism, which demeans them as humans and provides them with even more difficulties and hardships to face on top of trying to be the machismo man that is expected of them by their own community. With this combination of oppressions, I’m sure that the demeaning of their sistas is one of the only ways present for the black male to feel like they are the man they feel like they need to be, and I think it is this that Morgan makes a beautiful point of drawing light on for her audience’s better understanding of her brother’s struggles.